Thursday, November 03, 2005

I have a good friend who I met at an Oxfam volunteer group this summer. His wit is biting, yet humourous. He can make people laugh and has a away with worlds. In the words of the inimitable Mr. Brandon Marlon, a poem about poverty.

Apathy As Atrocity

Shibboleth utterances convey attractive arguments down a slippery slope
But still there’s not enough rope to reel in the grievances of the day
We are dying to deliver an encomium for some leading moral soul
Who understands the heavy toll we pay by the day
Sometimes by the second, fleeting and finite
Alas, we have yet to find such a worthy candidate to champion the cause
Who, despite all his flaws, takes a firm global stand
And strikes up the international band live in concert for more than some Special
Every telethon goes off the air, its moment in the public conscious archived

Hold the phone now, stop the show
We need one more NGO
“People For the Ethical Treatment of People”
Without a wealthy figurehead as Chair of the Board
Whose stomach has only ever growled from overeating
Whose obesity threatens his ability to squish into leathered limousines
For when did a fat cat ever help a desperate hummingbird calling out in the wind
I’ll have to look it up in the empty annals of oblivion

Teach a man to fish and he’ll soon concoct his own recipe for tartar sauce
I’ll bet my crumbling slum shack on it
Remember me, please, as one voice who spoke up to the world’s listeners
I am the filthy body turning purple shivering on a Rideau Street sidewalk
A sun-caked child playing soccer around syringes on a blistering Nigerian dirt road
Chaos and havoc are my closest friends in this dusty gravel patch of paradise lost
But chronic hunger and creeping famine often tag along
With their Top 40 hit starvation song

What I lack in amenities I make up for in Technicolor dreams of banquet feasts
Where I lounge on a divan nibbling luscious grapes as antiquated Eastern kings
Chronicled in books I’ll never read because I’m not quite up to speed
Because I can’t concentrate on an empty stomach shrinking daily
I’m sorry to adjust your view and burden you with what I say
But could you honestly live on less than one dollar a day?
You call crumbs in bed a nuisance; I call it a picnic
A hungry being is a city under siege
Whose fortified walls are withering like ancient battered gates

Take a good look at how the other half live
Then reach deep into willpower, it’s in you to give
Yes, but don’t gather too close, I value personal space
I might slap your face with an ice cold statistic you’d rather not hear
I may not even last this upcoming year, my darling dear
Long enough to receive your High Holiday kindness in seasonal dose
It would be nice to end sanctions on the indigent mass
Those of us in the lower depths of destitution’s underclass
It would be nice to lift the crippling embargo against compassion’s full stretch
And convict apathy in the International Criminal Court of crimes against humanity

I won’t inject awkward vibes into the small crowded room of the mind
Where the underlying tensions may give birth to anger or action
I shouldn’t shake away ignorance from pressed lapels
With choice words like alleviate and dispel/Stricken or exacerbate
Though perhaps if you could pardon my innate urge to highlight the disparity
Then all the world’s harps would strum to the sound of ten trillion sorrows
Through nimble fingers of collective conscience
Then bagpipes and violins would leap into neatly-formed rows
To wail the warm earthly emotions of anguish on a catastrophic scale

I should warn you at first the floodgates might burst
Into an outpouring of despair coupled with confusion’s debilitating delusion
That nothing can be done before such widespread disaster
Or that these travesties are natural and should be left alone
I should warn you further that only the poor can save the poor
So learn the easy way while its offer is made available
I would hate for you to finally enforce empathetic justice
Only once Fate in its fickle wisdom
Humbles your standard to rest on humiliated par with my own
Prince and Pauper suddenly reunited by human revolution or divine judgment
Arriving unexpectedly to crash negligence’s exclusive gala soirée
Shattering comfortable solitudes between ivory tower and lowly pit of affliction

When fields lie fallow and gardens go untended by tender hands
The lands cry out for attention in affectionate dimensions
When water sources are scarce and tainted at best
Challenge never rests for a sabbatical from parched-throat oppression
And we the forgotten populous are left stranded in dire isolation
Like a worthy bride at a loss for a loyal, loving groom
I shudder to think you could leave me teetering on the brink
When assistance is readily at hand for the global citizen of concern
Who can conscientiously discern between realistic reaction and impotent inaction
Ineptness is not the answer to the ongoing question of my peril
Now existence is sterile but it may eventually come alive
It may even flourish and thrive when goodwill has its way
And civilization’s flute plays a universal melody channeled across hemispheres

Indifference is a continent in need of a good swift conquering
Its army of excuses court-martialed and disbanded with dishonorable discharge
Imagine the heart-rending harmony when new legions of hope set foot amid turmoil
Battalions of encouragement roaming the avenues of entrenched dismay
A brigade of peace to a war-torn corner of strife
Lying too long huddled alone under the cutting knife
The finest united force should be an infantry of easement to allay local fears
To buttress the fresh tears of joy that faith in fraternity was no mere ploy

If would you let me utter a genuine prayer from the gutter
I would marginalize succor in favor of stern demands on world governments
Proven measures are neglected treasures where I come from
I have no brittle Dead Sea Scroll to explain how I lived
Only a fragile corpse to attest to my defiance in the face of emaciated faces
Staring back at me from a lifetime of glass mirror reflections
You can always turn on trusty PBS for a sample taste of my distress
The cadaver tells the tale of how mankind continually fails
To address the plight of the impoverished whose basic needs go unmet
Despite acts of excess elsewhere carelessly conducted for superficial spectacle
Like competitive eating competitions where some skinny Japanese youth
Is widely extolled for stuffing his thin frame with fifty wieners in under five minutes

I know life is beautiful from hearsay – juicy gossip to my ears
A rumor as old as the soil that coughs up blood in my front yard
I want to believe it but only with good reason
There is surely something more that I’ve come to know
Poverty cannot be solved by charity, forgive me for saying
The plain truth hurts but isn’t it a beautiful pain?
I’m not asking for much, really, as such
Don’t look away, neither by percent nor degree
I invite you to share this opportunity to care
Don’t look away, lest you shut our eyes forever

Sunday, October 23, 2005

Dear XX,
I found this email you sent did indeed get me thinking but in different ways than the email intended perhaps.

First of all, it is really important to never be a sucker to a chain letter. As soon as I saw the email, it reeked like a chain letter so I just tried Google and found the following links which expose the hoax. (These are just the top two).

http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/annegraham.html
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/wheregod.htm

You will notice that what Anne Graham Lotz said is actually a very small portion of the email. The rest of it was someone deliberately trying to mislead by writing it in a way that attributes the rest of the email to her.

If you read the contents of the email and start trying to cross check the facts you will realize that real spelling is Madalyn Murray O'Hair. She first started trying to get prayer out of schools in 1960 (yes nineteen sixty). Since Americans started sending troops to Vietnam before that, terrorism hasn't occurred starting with her action. And certainly it occurred before Vietnam. The reference to her death seems very callous without the notion of any sadness about it. Please see Madalyn Murray O Hair to get details about her life and tragic death.

The email then goes on to mention Benjamin Spock and mentions the tragedy of his son taking his own life. Among the awful things that Benjamin Spock suggested was to be more affectionate to your children and pick them up and hold them when they cried. He was certainly against spanking and here is the reason from
RW Online

On Spanking: It teaches children that the larger, stronger person has the power to get his way, whether or not he is in the right.... Some spanked children feel quite justified in beating up on smaller ones.
While I agree with the above statement, I do feel that having laws against spanking is a bit much because most often, it is the parent who has the child's welfare in mind more than anybody else. There are already laws to protect children from physical abuse (as distinct from spanking).

Even though the Bible says things like "Thou shalt not kill", we have had that wisdom well before the advent of a single god into our philosophies. The Chinese, Indians, Egyptians, Mesopotamians, Greeks and Romans had these ideas long before the bible. It was good common sense and still is.

I do agree with one point that the email makes. While obscene and funny emails pass through too many mailboxes, the same can be said for emails pretending to be high and mighty and moral.

To answer the question the emails asks, I am not laughing, just saddened how people who believe in 'God' are unable to see all the bias in this email.

I sincerely hope that you send out a retraction to all your friends who were misinformed by this email. I do hope that you will still keep sending me emails from time to time as you do.

Take care,
n.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: AB
> [mailto:removed]
> Sent: October 17, 2005 1:22 PM
> Subject: Very Interesting......
>
> Hello friends,
>
> I got this from a friend, whom I believe is a very
> good person for being
> brave and sending this out to her friends. Weather
> or not you believe in
> God, you really have to ask yourself what is the
> world coming to.
>
> I know I believe and I'm trying to make a difference
> in this world. If I
> only help one person, I will still feel good that I
> made a difference.
>
> God bless you and I hope you find it in your heart
> to treat people the way
> you want to be treated...with respect and love.
>
> AB
> —--------------
> AND WE SAID OK
>
> In light of the many perversions and jokes we send
> to one another for a
> laugh, this is a little different: This is not
> intended to be a joke, it's
> not funny, it's intended to get you thinking.
>
> Billy Graham's daughter was interviewed on the Early
> Show and Jane Clayson
> asked her "How could God let something like this
> happen?" (regarding the
> attacks on Sept. 11.
>
> Anne Graham gave an extremely profound and
> insightful response. She said, "I
> believe God is deeply saddened by this, just as we
> are, but for years we've
> been telling God to get out of our schools, to get
> out of our government and
> to get out of our lives.
>
> And being the gentleman He is, I believe He has
> calmly backed out.
>
> How can we expect God to give us His blessing and
> His protection if we
> demand He leave us alone?"
>
> In light of recent events...terrorists attack,
> school shootings, etc. I
> think it started when Madeleine Murray O'Hare (she
> was murdered, her body
> found recently) complained she didn't want prayer in
> our schools, and we
> said OK.
>
> Then someone said you better not read the Bible in
> school . the Bible says
> thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, and love
> your neighbor as
> yourself. And we said OK.
> Then Dr. Benjamin Spock said we shouldn't spank our
> children when they
> misbehave because their little personalities would
> be warped and we might
> damage their self-esteem (Dr. Spock's son committed
> suicide).
>
> We said an expert should know what he's talking
> about. And we said OK.
>
> Now we're asking ourselves why our children have no
> conscience, why they
> don't know right from wrong, and why it doesn't
> bother them to kill
> strangers, their classmates, and themselves.
> Probably, if we think about it long and hard enough,
> we can figure it out. I
> think it has a great deal to do with "WE REAP WHAT
> WE SOW."
>
> Funny how simple it is for people to trash God and
> then wonder why the world's going to hell.
>
> Funny how we believe what the newspapers say, but
> question what the Bible says.
>
> Funny how you can send 'jokes' through e-mail and
> they spread like wildfire
> but when you start sending messages regarding the
> Lord, people think twice
> about sharing.
>
> Funny how lewd, crude, vulgar and obscene articles
> pass freely through
> cyberspace, but public discussion of God is
> suppressed in the school and workplace.
>
> Are you laughing?
>
> Funny how when you forward this message, you will
> not send it to many on
> your address list because you're not sure what they
> believe, or what they
> WILL think of you for sending it.
>
> Funny how we can be more worried about what other
> people think of us than what God thinks of us.
>
> Pass it on if you think it has merit. If not then
> just discard it... no one will know you did.
>
> But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit
> back and complain about what bad shape the world is in!!
>

Saturday, January 22, 2005

Much has been made of the inaugural address of George W. Bush. It seems intriguing that most of the press should be fawning over every little step, smile and gesture of the presidential entourage while people die elsewhere due to their wilful neglect. An interesting contrast is the op-ed piece, Dancing the War Away by Bob Herbert, January 21, 2005, NYT (free registration required), which does an excellent job of highlighting their remorseless demeanour during the festivities and the extent of their double talk during the past few days.

The media has often been complacent at times when difficult questions should be asked and complicit when conscientious objections should have been raised. Investigative journalism or muckraking as referred to by Theodore Roosevelt, has died many deaths since. In the same way that it felt betrayed after "helping" to get Roosevelt elected, current media has been labelled liberal and been all but excluded from presidential contact and its priveleges. But instead of protesting its exclusion, as the investigative journalists did during Roosevelt's time, media has tried to endear itself to the political powers by all but completely suffocating any critical or dissenting points of view. This form of self-censorship is far more effective than ex-Soviet or Chinese style overt censorship. Of course media refuses to see this because their salaries depend on selling themselves as free of bias. That should be the first reason to question their freedom from it.

Tuesday, July 06, 2004

Saharsha came across this and asked me to take the test and so I happily volunteered. But I think the test is a bit inaccurate because my self assessment reveals that I probably belong in the eighth level of hell. At least it accurately predicted that my score is Extreme.


The Dante's Inferno Test has banished you to the Seventh Level of Hell!
Here is how you matched up against all the levels:
LevelScore
Purgatory (Repenting Believers)Very Low
Level 1 - Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers)Very Low
Level 2 (Lustful)Very High
Level 3 (Gluttonous)Moderate
Level 4 (Prodigal and Avaricious)Low
Level 5 (Wrathful and Gloomy)Very High
Level 6 - The City of Dis (Heretics)Very High
Level 7 (Violent)Extreme
Level 8- the Malebolge (Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers)Extreme
Level 9 - Cocytus (Treacherous)High

Take the Dante's Divine Comedy Inferno Test

Wednesday, June 23, 2004

A lot has been said about strategic voting both, North and South of the border. Strategic voting is one where you don't vote for your favoured candidate or party but for one that is the lesser of several evils. Does that really make a whole lot of sense ? One example I often like to cite is the growth of the Green Party in Germany from a fringe party about 25 years to go being half the government now. The same could be possible today for the Conservative party. So my take on the matter is that it is important to vote idealistically because it is important to provide support to the party and ideas that one most believes in.

If the population sees a new party or candidate getting more attention and votes, they will be naturally inquisitve about it and the added exposure will snowball over time if the ideas or parties are sound. So when voting it is important not to think of just this election but about the direction of the state or country as a whole over the next several elections.

So once again the blogging madness sets in. I have been thinking about writing for a while but I am not sure how time flies by. I have been following the electoral campaigns quite closely and I am not sure if I should laugh or if I should cry. Lots of interesting writing on both sides of the border.

North of the border, the dilemma is whether to maintain the status quo or to vote for an alternative. Lets look at the alternatives. On the one hand, we have the Conservatives, whose opportunism and utter lack of decorum clearly indicates just how far to the right they are and how low far right parties are really willing to go to try to get votes. The conservative party's release which stated that Paul Martin "supports" child pornography was a clear mistake because it is quite obvious to even the most simplistic mind that such a career politician would not commit political suicide for the pedophile vote. Stephen Harper's refusal to retract was an even bigger mistake because he could have easily come out looking very good if he stated that the language was "unfortunate", "inappropriate" etc. but that they maintain that the Liberals are not taking the issue as seriously as the conservatives. Also, the leak about the AirCanada french service issue will not be taken lightly since it was revealed in such a under handed manner.

The NDP are a party who I agree with in many ways philosophically yet I think they lack the discipline of the Liberals. In Ontario, the provincial Liberals had had a stranglehold on power for way too long and the people elected the NDP in a protest vote of sorts. Unfortunately, the NDP squandered this mandate by over spending and that sort of behaviour is hard to condone in personal affairs and just as difficult to condone in governmental affairs. Besides, the leader as photogenic as he may be, has a medicated perma-smile which really grates on one after a while.

I am not going to spend any time talking about the Bloc Quebecois other than they are very interesting in their socially progressive outlook. If only they weren't separatist I would have respect for their philosophy. I find divisive politics to be the cheapest and ugliest manifestation of politics.

So the Liberals are at least fiscal conservatives, social progressives needing a serious kick in the arse since they have been in power for too long. An unstable conservative minority government which then falls apart in a year or two could be good for the country because it would be a kick in the proverbial rear to all parties involved. (Credit to several friends who mentioned this independently of each other a while back).

Wednesday, May 05, 2004

Since we have elections coming up ... Yes dear Americans, Canada has elections too and contrary to popular belief we are not a bunch of commies. Not that there is anything wrong with being a commie. In fact, some of my best friends are commies. An interesting article for those who might think that Stephen Harper might be worth voting for just to give the Liberals a wakeup call.

I think it is a good idea to stay on good terms with the US, both economically and militarily. But that certainly does not include participating in their misadventures across the globe. The article cites a poll and a surprisingly large number of Canadians want to keep a comfortable distance from American foreign and social policy. Given the fundamentally different natures of the culture, it should not be all that surprising that Canadians see things differently. If you are interested in opposing missile defence go to NOWAR-PAIX and download the PDF of the post-card and send it in. There is more information about upcoming actions on their website as well.

P.S. Come to think of it a party in the US with Liberal in its name would only have slightly better chance of getting elected than one that had Communist in its name.

Tuesday, May 04, 2004

So I watched Kill Bill Vol. 2 last night. The first thirty minutes was really dumb and slow. For a supposedly polished assassin, The Bride makes a really dumb move. Before she made that move, I said to myself that if she made that particular move, I would kick Quentin Tarantino's ass for being a fool. Now believing any movie involves a wilful suspension of disbelief to enjoy. I was doing my part in believing that she is a polished assassin. Then she does this really dumb move which irritated me and everyone else I went with because now you can't suspend your disbelief any more (for a while). Enough about the silliness. The story is developed well albeit a little slowly during these first thirty minutes as well which sort of feels like a prologue to Vol. 2.

Then the real movie starts. There is some interesting symbolism in the way she escapes her grave (you have to watch the movie to know what I mean) and more about her relationship with Bill and more about Bill is revealed. At this point the avenging is in full swing and quite grotesquely enjoyable. Her training in the martial arts is entertaining due to a heavily stereotyped kung-fu teacher, who is stern and yet caring in a stern way. The martial arts sequences were well choreographed and the fighting was quite intelligent. The end was well done for many reasons. For one, Tarantino decided to forego the epic fight and take a much more interesting strategic approach to the duel. It also reveals the nature of the bride's relationship to Bill and Bill's human side as well as the Bride's human side. I enjoyed it more than Vol. 1.

Overall though, the movie felt a big egotistical because some of the movie was done just because Tarantino could get away with it. There was a lot of cinematic panache to some of the shots but in the end the point is that the movie should be entertaining without dragging unnecessarily. It does the former but fails a little on the latter. Definitely worth a watch given all the utter garbage that passes for movies.